Today’s Sun Reveals New Uber Scam

Today’s Sun Reveals New Uber Scam

Following on from revelations that Uber customers have had their accounts hacked and in some cases have lost thousands of pounds, this scam is a spoof of an official communication from Uber in an attempt to trick Uber fans into visiting a fake payment site where their payment details are then stolen.

Users across the UK appear to have been targeted and there have been reports of the dodgy text from all across the country.

The cunning text tells the victim that they have booked a trip costing a whopping £217 pounds with an Uber driver called Imran.

The message is followed by a link that the user can then click on to cancel this unrequested journey – however this link redirects to a fake payment site asking for their banking details.

Any details entered can then be stolen by the hackers and either sold on or used to make expensive purchases

The con was first revealed by watchdog Action Fraud, which posted a screenshot of the text message online.

Uber has confirmed the messages to be fake, and has warned their users not to click on the link.

Under Uber’s terms and conditions they say the responsibility for scams of this type lay with the passenger and not the company

So, if you receive this text hit the ‘delete’ button and ignore it

The Time Has Come To Make A Difference

The Time Has Come To Make A Difference

Hi all, Thanks for seeking us out in your droves. We hope to launch in October, so time has come to cut to the chase. If you have questions like is downloading slots worth it? then reading across this site can answer that.

Don’t ask, what have Government, TFL, Orgs done for the trade? 
Ask, what ‘I’ can do for ‘my’ trade!. 
Recently you registered interest in Taxiapp, it’s now time to fill our membership form. You’ll be directed to ‘gocardless’. Please fill out the direct debit page. Subs will ‘not’ be taken till late September. To learn more, click here now! have a great day!
We’ll send the drivers app link before initial payment’s taken.
This Sundays ‘Shoutout’ will reveal the team of drivers who’ve been brave enough so far to have put their money where their mouths are and venture into the ‘Casino’ of fate.
No question about it, we are taking a gamble, we are about to conquer the biggest casino in the world, we are talking about winning. All we ask is for others to step up and place bets on us. Because if we together can’t save our trade, nobody’s going to do it for us! Do you want to be part of this too? Today is your chance to find out more about how to be a master at casino games.
We at Taxiapp have no intention of doing nothing while other predatory apps (Taxi & PH) feed off our trades decaying carcass!!!
Help us to fight back
Is Uber Really This Dumb And Arrogant?

Is Uber Really This Dumb And Arrogant?

by ,

What an extraordinary outburst from Uber. A week after throwing in the towel in China, the taxi app — which claims to employ no drivers and certainly owns no cars — is telling Londoners to lobby TfL on its behalf. Under some rant about keeping London open for business after Brexit, Uber’s UK Country Manager is asking the capital’s residents to complain to TfL over the transport regulator requiring taxi drivers to take an English test that Uber considers too difficult.

It’s a jaw-dropping piece of arrogance. The reader of the app’s email might well wonder how on earth the American tech giant can claim to have already invested GBP100m in London, considering it doesn’t actually own a fleet of cars and isn’t committed to employing its drivers. That surely must be a very expensive office the apps have opened up as for a foothold in the capital?

As a Londoner, all I can say is that this is really ill-judged. The capital’s residents have a funny relationship with black cabs. They’re an iconic part of the street that nobody would want to see removed, and although they are the butt of many jokes about selfish driving, Londoners actually have a great deal of respect for anyone who has passed “the knowledge” to earn their badge. Nevertheless, when you can hail a much cheaper ride, anyone’s going to be tempted.

It’s when that service moves on from being convenient and cheap — which we all know is because it’s cutting corners and ensuring it has negligible overheads — and starts lecturing that there’s a problem.

Now here’s the really stupid part — in fact. it’s so stupid it could only come from a tech company that isn’t based in Britain. The Brexit vote was a vote against what people considered to be cut-price labour flooding into Britain from the rest of the EU. I was a firm Remain voter, but I got the point that Leave campaigners were making. People are fed up with their towns being filled with cheap foreign labour who get every right to every state handout as a Brit and have the ability to take jobs off them too. I don’t agree with the sentiment but every Brit will tell you this is why the country voted to leave the EU.

So, in an email talking about keeping London open for business after Brexit, only the most stupid app imaginable would appeal to Londoners to encourage their transport regulator to go easy on foreigners needing to speak English before they can claim to be a cab driver. This goes completely against what the country has just voted for. People will still use Uber because it’s cheap and convenient, but it has just managed to do the two things Brits hate most.

It’s the rich tech company that is new to town and telling us what we should do at the same time it is telling us we need to relax English-language skills among migrant workers. If they want to make it three strikes and then out, I suggest a photo call where the country manager washes a cheap battered “taxi” with the Union Jack doubling up as rag. That would sum up this app’s arrogance and stupidity in one.

 

Read The original story here

Joining forces: National Taxi Association endorse TIC

Joining forces: National Taxi Association endorse TIC

The National Taxi Association invited Plan Insurance Brokers to present their innovative plans for how the industry can confront the widespread issue of taxi insurance fraud at the recent annual conference.

Plan Insurance Brokers have been lobbying regulators and insurers along with the taxi and private hire industry to promote the need for funds and resources to be allocated to tackling the problem of drivers operating with invalid cover. They believe their plans for an online portal with the working title Taxi Insurance Checker (TIC) would provide a quick, low cost and effective solution.


Why is action needed now?

Uninsured taxi and private hire drivers have become a more high profile problem over the last 2 years due the emergence of fare booking apps such as UBER that have seen driver numbers increase by 62% since 2010.

 

Why Taxi and Private hire drivers must have appropriate cover:

  • Public Safety Concerns – as illegal touts target vulnerable passengers
  • Delayed Compensation Payments – for passengers if vehicles are involved in accidents
  • Higher Motor Insurance Costs as law abiding drivers subsidise premiums
  • Licensed Taxi and Private Hire drivers not being “fit and proper” persons

 

TIC information pack

Click here to view our Taxi Insurance Checker (TIC) Information Pack PDF

Flaws in current systems

Outdated systems for detecting uninsured taxi and private hire drivers can seemingly no longer cope with the volume of drivers. MD of TfL Leon Daniels described the current means of detecting drivers without suitable insurance as a “laborious, hopeless manual system.”

There are now over 300,000 drivers licensed to carry passengers on the U.K.’s roads. A nationwide audit leaked to the BBC in 2011 revealed that up to 93% of drivers might have invalid cover. Due to the volume of drivers now operating the problem is only likely to have escalated.

 

How are uninsured taxi drivers evading detection?  

Presenting False Insurance Documents
Either doctored or duplicated documentation is supplied when applying for a Taxi or Private Hire licence.

Operating with Expired, Cancelled or Invalid Cover
To avoid their vehicle showing up on the police’s Automatic Number Plate Recognition checks as unregistered on the Motor Insurance Database drivers take out cheaper private car insurance that does not provide cover to drive passengers for the purposes of “Hire and Reward.”  This could be up to ten times cheaper than the premiums they should be paying.

Using Identity mirroring” scams
Multiple drivers may be operating under one licence using one vehicle 

 

Ryan Georgiades, Managing Director of Plan Insurance Brokers believes TIC is the way forward to help rid the road of uninsured drivers:

Taxi Insurance Checker online portal proposal

TIC is a perfect example of how technology can streamline processes and reduce costs. If implemented it will not only save operators time but it will give them complete confidence that their drivers have valid cover in place.

And it’s not only us who think that the portal is a good idea:

 The association believe the thinking behind TIC is beneficial towards not only insurers and operators but more importantly, the safety of the travelling public

Wayne Casey Administration Officer of the National Taxi Association

The GMB will keep lobbying regulators such as TfL to make this a top priority. Tackling the issue of drivers with invalid insurance is vitally for operators in order to protect both the good name of their business and the reputation of the industry as a whole.”


Steve Garelick  Branch Secretary ofGMB Union Professional Drivers’ Branch

 

So how will TIC Work?

 

TIC will provide authorities access to live information regarding the validity of taxi and private hire drivers’ insurance and crucially whether their policy provides cover for carrying passengers for the purposes of “Hire & Reward.”

The portal is similar in concept to the Motor Insurance Database, which has significantly reduced the number of uninsured drivers on the UK’s roads.

All taxi and private hire insurers will need to be registered on a database as approved suppliers.

Each taxi insurance certificate they issue will have a unique encrypted identifier code printed on it.

This can be decrypted by regulators, law enforcement officers, vehicle inspectors and operators by via the TIC portal.

Read more about the Taxi Insurance Checker (TIC) here.

 

Progress hits a road block with TfL

TfL initially expressed interest in developing such a system. The main strength being that it would provide operators access to key information that would otherwise be restricted to them due to data protection.

However TfL state they have been working with the MIB to provide authorised parties (which excludes taxi and private hire operators) access to “class of use” data for private hire and taxi vehicles via the MID.

They state private hire drivers are already having their insurance checked against this system at inspection centres.

 

TIC information pack

Click here to view our Taxi Insurance Checker (TIC) Information Pack PDF 

Plan have cause for concern regarding the accuracy of the “class of use” data held by the MID.

Despite insuring over 7,000 taxi and private hire vehicles their main insurer partner has received no contact from the MIB to request they supply the relevant information in the required format.

Plan have also been informed unofficially that some police forces have stopped ANPR cameras running full MID checks as the MIB charges on a per search basis and the searches were proving too costly.

Source: Plan Insurance

Open Letter To Uber Who Won’t Apologise For Their Driver Assaulting Passenger

Open Letter To Uber Who Won’t Apologise For Their Driver Assaulting Passenger

Dear Uber bosses, employees and stakeholders,

I am writing an open letter to you because you will not respond to my tweets, messages and emails two days after I was assaulted and left crying by one of your drivers.

I am writing because as a female travelling at night in London I feel it is essential to let other women and men know the dangers your drivers can pose.

I am writing because not enough people know that last year there were over 300 sexual assaults, and 30 rapes, in your vehicles. If this were any other crimes there would be a huge scandal but you have managed to keep this one quiet.

And it’s not ok.

Women have a right to feel safe and protected when travelling alone, and this should be one of your non-negotiable policies. And yet horrible assaults regularly take place within your cars. The media do very little. How much have you paid them to keep quiet?

My assault happened two days ago, when I was coming back home and really wanting to get back safely and quickly.

I had had a horrible weekend with my fiance cutting off our engagement, cancelling our wedding which I was so looking forward to, and cancelling our home purchase. We were meant to move into our first home together next month.

Of course, you or your driver couldn’t possibly have known this. But regardless, you should provide a safe service to your customers: male or female, young or old, rich or poor.

They should never be made to feel intimidated, abused, frightened or upset when paying for a service which is only to be driven safely from A to B.

When I posted about this on Twitter, you didn’t reply. Instead, you posted pictures of Rio and other exotic locations. Why fling your ambition so widely when you can’t even provide a safe service within the UK?

You then rang me at work at 10am when I was in a meeting and refused my polite request to email instead. Why?

Here is the link to the Evening Standard article. Luckily for me, when the driver called me a slut and dropped me in the middle of a dual carriageway with oncoming traffic, at 11.30pm, in the dark, with no cash, scared and alone, miles from my destination, a kind Black Cab driver picked me up and drove me home. Unlike your drivers, he spoke in a friendly, calm way, helping me reach my destination and recover my equilibrium. I cannot thank that Black Cab driver enough.

Uber, it’s nearly 3 days since my assault and I haven’t had an apology from you. My tweet has had over 200 retweets — it’s terrible publicity for you.

When will you apologise? Until you acknowledge your culpability in this, the women and men of London cannot travel safely within your cars.

Yours sincerely,

Frances Carbines

Proposals for the A100 Tower Bridge Road junction with Queen Elizabeth Street, Southwark

Proposals for the A100 Tower Bridge Road junction with Queen Elizabeth Street, Southwark

Overview

We are proposing to improve pedestrian crossing and cycle facilities at this junction and ban the left-turn (except cycles) southbound on Tower Bridge Road heading into Queen Elizabeth Street to reduce through-traffic and make it safer for pedestrians and cyclists.

What are we proposing?

Tower Bridge Road provides a north-south link across the River and is of strategic importance for general traffic as it is part of London’s inner ring-road and is the outer boundary of the congestion charging zone. It is also a key junction for cyclists, forming part of an east-west route on the south side of the River.

At the junction, the existing cycle and pedestrian refuge in the central reservation is narrow and becomes overcrowded, particularly during peak periods. Three arms of the junction are signalised while the Queen Elizabeth Street eastbound approach is give-way, creating conflict with cyclists. So we are proposing to:

  • Ban the left turn-for all vehicles (except southbound cyclists) from Tower Bridge Road heading into Queen Elizabeth Street eastbound to reduce conflict with cyclists and make the junction safer for all road users. Our counts show that up to 45 vehicles make this turn in the morning peak hour and 66 cyclists in the evening peak hour
  • Formalise pedestrian crossings on the southern, western and northern arms of the junction with the addition of pedestrian countdown, giving more information to pedestrians to inform their crossing decisions
  • Add two-stage right-turns for cyclists at the junction to reduce conflict with drivers
  • Extend the central reservation on Tower Bridge Road at the junction to give more space for pedestrians and cyclists waiting to cross
  • Improve road markings and add an Advance Stop Line for cyclists on the eastbound approach to the junction on Queen Elizabeth Street
  • Build-out the footway on the north-eastern side of Queen Elizabeth Street to give more space for pedestrians

 

We would also resurface the road at the junction and renew the footway.

These changes would mean southbound vehicles would need to take a different route into Queen Elizabeth Street eastbound as it would no longer be possible to turn into it from Tower Bridge Road. This would reduce through-traffic using residential streets. We also expect it would attract more cyclists to the already-busy cycle route by making it safer and giving continuity along the route and a link with the planned Cycle Superhighway 4.

If, following this consultation, we decide to go ahead with these improvements, we expect to carry-out the works in October 2016 to co-incide with the planned temporary closure of Tower Bridge for structural work (currently scheduled for October 2016 to January 2017) to minimise disruption in the area.

Drawing of proposals for A100 Tower Bridge Road junction with Queen Elizabeth Street

Please click here for a larger version of the above map (PDF)

Have your say

We would like to know what you think about our proposals.

Please give us your views by completing the online survey below by 29 August 2016.

Alternatively, you can:

Have your say

Online Survey

Related Documents

Open Letter To Uber Who Won’t Apologise For Their Driver Assaulting Passenger

Woman claims Uber driver called her a ‘slut’ and kicked her out of cab after going the wrong way

A young woman claims an Uber driver called her a “slut” and threw her out of his car after she pointed out he appeared to be driving her home in completely the wrong direction.

Frances Carbines, 27, went out for dinner at Dishoom in Shoreditch with friends last night after she split from her fiancé, she said.

The British Council worker said she was feeling “fragile” but had gone out with her would-be bridesmaids, who were trying to console her following the break-up.

She said one of her bridesmaids called her an Uber after the meal, at about 11.30pm, and put the postcode for her home address in Crouch End into the app. However, she claims that instead of driving her home, the driver started taking her to the “opposite end” of London.

Miss Carbines claims that when she had told the driver he was going the wrong way he became aggressive, calling her a “slut” and commenting on her short skirt, before telling her to get out of the car on Waterloo Bridge.

An Uber spokesman said the firm was investigating the claims but denied the driver had been abusive towards Miss Carbines. He added that the passenger was taken in the direction of the address that had been entered into the app.

But Miss Carbines told the Standard: “He took the wrong address and tried to take me to Brixton. When I complained he said I must live in Brixton because the system couldn’t be wrong.

“He said ‘get out or something bad will happen to you’ and stopped on a busy dual carriageway. He didn’t even pull over, then he called me a slut.

“I was shaken and crying and the Uber driver made me get out at night miles from home. The Uber driver commented on my short skirt and said I must be easy.”

Miss Carbines, who works in cultural relations for the British Council for projects in Beirut and Pakistan, said she was left feeling “frightened” when she was asked to leave the car.

“I didn’t have cash for a taxi, which is why I got the Uber,” she said.

“I had no idea where I was, it was dark, I had had a beer and I couldn’t even get a bus as I have been overdrawn.

“I was especially fragile because that weekend my fiancé called off our engagement and cancelled our new shared ownership house.”

Miss Carbines said she was eventually picked up by a black cab driver, who agreed to take her to Crouch End.

She said her mother was at home and was able to pay the driver, but he only asked for £20 instead of the usual £30 fare.

She is now appealing for the taxi driver to come forward, so that she can thank him for his kindness.

Miss Carbines described him as a slim Londoner with grey hair, square framed glasses, and a “kindly face”, who had been working as a driver for 20 years.

She said: “I’d want to say thank you so much for saving me essentially when I couldn’t get home.

“Your kindly disposition and act of humanity really cheered me up, please meet me as I owe you £10 and a drink. I wish more drivers could be like you.”

Miss Carbines has also demaned an apology from Uber.

However, the company denied that the incident unfolded as Miss Carbines described.

An Uber spokesman said: “We have called the rider in question so we can investigate these allegations, but have yet to receive a response.

“The driver in question has confirmed he was going to Brixton to an address that was pre-entered into the rider app.

“The driver has told us that the rider became angry that they were going to the entered destination and requested to exit the car. He denies being abusive towards the rider and so we would ask her to get in touch with us so we can investigate further.”

 

Source: Evening Standard

More evidence where Uber admit they do not handle the booking

More evidence where Uber admit they do not handle the booking

In a letter to Westminster Planning Department Uber openly admit that they do not handle any bookings and that their app just connects the passenger to the nearest driver.

 

They further state “In this way the network can operate independently, with the clients able to phone the driver directly through the app”.

Uber also says “It is important to note that we will not be taking any traditional pre booking jobs”.

Read the full letter below

CpXB8MBW8AA4bpA

THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN…..ByDads Defending Daughters.

THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN…..ByDads Defending Daughters.

Warning, the article below contains strong language. Normally we would remove, but in this instance we believe it would take away from the passion contained within this post.

WE ARE NOW LIVING IN AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE
WHERE TAXIS ROAST ON RANKS
AND MINICABS WORK THE STREETS.
The Olympics are back – this time in Rio.
Since the Albino Buffoon sold the Taxi Trade down the Thames during the London Olympics, Transport for London could not have done a worse job.
Four years ago John Mason gave an American IT company, registered in the Netherlands, a Private Hire Operators License.
Private Hire roundels can be purchased from TfL, no questions asked.
Uber is allowed to Ply for instant Hire via an App, as Taxis sit and roast on ranks, whilst being harassed by TfL Compliance Officers for over-ranking and other mundane misdemeanours. All the while, uninformed people stand waiving their phones, touting for a Prius.
The new ‘For Hire’ sign in London is the Toyota symbol, courtesy of TfL.
Prior to the 2012 Olympics, Taxis plied for Hire on the streets of London, whilst legitimate Private Hire mincabs parked up outside their own Offices.
If a Minicab was seen ‘hanging it up’ outside a club, he was instantly recognised as a tout.
That is before London was deregulated into a lawless Wild West show.
In the four years since Uber rode into Dodge, Transport for London have been prompted to demolish Taxis, and deregulate the Private Hire industry back to the bad ol’ days before regulation, by people like Baroness Susan Kramer (Minister of State for Transport and patron on the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, who received a £700k donation from the Carlyle Group who own Addison Lee, who now use an Uber style app and work model) who lobbied for the promotion of CBH [Cross Border Hirings – minicabs working in Boroughs and Counties they are not licensed in], which aided Addison Lee and Uber; and GLA quango member Peter Anderson (Chairman of the Canary Wharf Group – owned by the Qatari’s who have invested over a £billion in Uber); and David Cameron (Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, whose child’s Godmother is Uber executive, Rachel Whetstone), who warned Boris Johnson (Mayor of London) to “Leave Uber alone.”; and George Osborne (Chancellor of the Exchequer) who personally lobbied the former Mayor, on Uber’s behalf; and Sajid Javid (Secretary of State for Business) who openly promoted Uber as the successor to London Taxis; and Goldman Sachs (known as ‘Government Sachs’, due to their influence and total ownership of corrupt governments around the world, such as Her Majesty’s Bullingdon government) who throughout time in memorial have put profits before peasants, no matter what collateral damage is caused.
These friends in high places have made sure their cohorts at TfL, John Mason, Peter Hendy, Leon Daniels, Garrett Emmerson and company were coated in Teflon.
So began a two horse Mayoral race, which Sadiq Khan, with his promises of dealing with the corruption at TfL and beyond, won handsomely.
Part of the new Mayor’s manifesto fell just short of George Galloway’s claim to “Run Uber out of town.”
So what, under Khan and Shawcross’s short reign, has changed so far?
Fortunately many of the players who put Londoners and London’s visitors at risk, have been moved away from direct involvement between TfL and Uber.
Cameron was forced to resign, Osborne was unceremoniously sacked, Javid’s new job is the political equivalent of teaboy in the North Pole, Bojo helped Zac Goldsmith lose the Mayoral election, then stabbed his way into a new Cabinet job, in true Machiavellian style, and many of the quango who did not declare their vested interests in Uber and other Private Hire companies, like Peter Anderson, have been booted off the Board.
And trade Org and Union representatives seem to believe Mike Brown is as good as his word – only time will tell.
So far nothing has happened, except more promises.
TfL have openly admitted that many Private Hire vehicles were not insured.
TfL even set a deadline for all Private Hire vehicles to purchase said insurance.
Can you imagine what would happen to an uninsured Taxi?
The taxi would have been issued a ‘Stop Notice’ with immediate effect, and the driver would have been charged for driving without proper insurance.
But if you were a Private Hire driver, you were allowed by TfL and the Metropolitan Police to carry on working and picking up passengers whilst uninsured until the deadline.
In essence, TfL and the Metropolitan Police aided and abetted illegal activity, on behalf of Uber.
So far the Mayor’s Office and Mike Brown are looking good; mainly because Johnson’s TfL were so bloody awful.
At the moment all that the new brooms at TfL are doing, is their job.
Private Hire have always been obliged by law to have insurance – but TfL never enforced it.
Thorough Enhanced DBS checks have always been the rule – but TfL never enforced it.
Laws are only as good as their enforcement.
Where is the official public enquiry?
Are the ‘powers that be’ going to close ranks and protect the guilty, as they usually do?
Where is the promised cap?
All words and no do, so far.
There has been some serious wrongdoing inside and outside of TfL. The GLA have not emerged untainted either.
More and more Private Hire drivers are disarming TfL Compliance Officers, by ripping their roundels out.
Because of Baroness Kramer’s despicable promotion of CBH, Private Hire minicabs can circumnavigate TfL’s jurisdiction, without the need for TfL stickers or roundels.
Unless Mayor Khan takes time out from his photo shoots across the capital too devise a plan to combat this loophole, capping will become just another pointless piece of political posturing.
Recently, my RMT Union representatives got their arses smacked by the Deputy Mayor, Val Shawcross, for attending a meeting unprepared on one of their issues.
The unspoken, secret, gagging ordered issue of the rise in rape and sexual assault by Private Hire drivers.
Whether is was Deputy Mayor Shawcross’s intimation or the beliefs of my representatives, is not clear – but Taxi drivers’ motives were brought into question.
It was inferred that some MPs and those in high office are of the opinion that Taxi drivers were ‘all of a sudden’ horrified by the sharp rise in Minicab rapes, because the deregulation of the Private Hire industry started to affect drivers pockets.
I will answer this accusation in the very same way I answered it instantly in my mind, whilst waiting for my turn to speak, during our last RMT Branch meeting:
“How dare you suggest that this is to do with fucking money or fucking protectionism!
Exactly the same as our uninformed Union reps, and ninety nine percent of the population, WE DID NOT KNOW THIS WAS GOING ON!
Do you think we were driving around not giving a fuck that three girls a week were being assaulted in Minicabs, until it hit our pockets? How dare you!
We are fathers first and foremost! The rest is incidental decoration.
WE DIDN’T KNOW! Not until representatives from the UCG and LCDC did some great investigative work and uncovered the facts (via the Freedom of Information Act), did we dream it was as fucking awful as it turned out to be!
As soon as Danny Hussey, Sean Pier and I knew, we asked what our Orgs and Unions were doing about it?
At the time, our Orgs and Union representatives seemed embroiled in Taxi and legal matters.
So we took it upon ourselves to inform the public.
We designed some banners, and headed for the BBC – the rest is history.
Fuck you, you cynical c@@ts! Kids are having their lives destroyed, and you, because money and power and greed and ego matters more than people do, you judge us by your guttersnipe standards. Fuck off!”
Fortunately I had time to collect my thoughts before it was my turn to speak, and I delivered my reasoning on the matter … dispassionately.
Outside the Branch meeting, saying our farewells, a senior member suggested to me that all our efforts might be seen as nothing more than protectionism, by cynical MPs and those in the GLA.
I informed him that my Dads Defending Daughters efforts were from a place MPs might no longer recognise – integrity.
And that my Taxi Trade efforts were indeed from a form of unapologetic protectionism.
I told him my form of protectionism is from a need to protect, not just my job, but the profession of which I am proudly a member. A profession that is taken sometimes for granted in this city, but recognised around the world as the best, the Gold Standard.
I asked him, do not Politicians go to extreme lengths to protect their Party, even to the extent that they sacrifice their principles and dignity for the good of the Party?
Do MPs not vote against their better judgment and against their constituents’ wishes, sometimes throwing the vulnerable on the pyre, along with their own self respect, to further the Party line and their own careers?
Do MPs not cocoon themselves against the harsh realities that they have caused?
Do MPs not ‘let them eat cake’ whilst giving themselves a wage rise of double figured percent?
And now they have the cheek to pontificate to us about protectionism?
Those who close ranks and protect their own against prosecution of war crimes, embezzlement and paedophilia, have the neck to stand in ethical judgement of us Plebeians? Jog the fuck on!
Again, I informed him, they are judging us by their standards.
There will be protests coming, causing chaos and disruption to London. Sometimes to highlight the increase in rape and decrease in TfL accountability, and sometimes to highlight the inequality the Taxi trade faces during its destruction by bullies in high office.
We do apologise to those innocent travellers who may be affected by our more ‘stubborn’ demonstrations.
But ‘highlight’ we will, the the corruption and thoughtless disregard the present Government and TfL (under the Mayor’s Office) have for the working men and women of this once great city.
           
Footnote: I apologise for the colourful language used in this article. Sometimes a well placed ‘fuck’ translates more appropriately than the accepted language of polite society.
Posted by Dads Defending Daughters at 15:21
Leon Daniels, £25m Later….Chaos

Leon Daniels, £25m Later….Chaos

Leon Daniels stated, “The return of two way traffic at Elephant and Castle, will transform it to a place people want to be”.


 

New traffic systems, plus the segregated cycle lanes have bought London to virtual gridlock. The situation has become so bad that Metropolitan Police Armed Response Officers will be arriving at incidents on the back of motorbikes. Every day, we see emergency services stuck in the gridlock surrounding the Cycle Supper Highway.
Badly thought out systems are seeing journey lengths increased in time and distance as vehicles are banned from no left turns/ no right turns at certain junctions. Westbound traffic along the embankment wishing to use Westminster Bridge, now have to travel an extra quarter of a mile, plus bringing more traffic and more pollution through Parliament Square. All because cyclists can’t be trusted to cross the road properly with other right turning vehicles at the bridge junction.
Preventable deaths in London caused by pollution from traffic emissions has risen sharply in parallel with the new cycle lanes, from 8,000 to 10,000 per annum.
Traffic is set to get a lot worse as both Westminster and Islington Councils plan to take two major roads away from motorist. Tottenham Court Road is to become buses and bikes only. Taxis and private cars are to be diverted into Gower Street (already gridlocked most of the day) which will become two way.
But the system that will effect the traffic most of all, is the pedestrianisation of Oxford Street. Oxford street looks for most of the day and night like a bus garage, full of stationary, empty buses. Where are all these buses supposed to go?
Figures showed that on the day I the last bus strike, pollution levels around the Oxford Street area, dropped dramatically by an amazing 50%.