Breaking News : TfL take Backward Step In Regards To CC Mandate And Taxi Condition Of Fitness

Breaking News : TfL take Backward Step In Regards To CC Mandate And Taxi Condition Of Fitness

TfLTPH have clearly shown today, that the Credit Card mandate and associated condition of fitness, is a product of third party interest, rather than what’s best for the driver and the passenger.

News was afoot early in the day when CabVision posted on their Twitter feed, there would now be a “soft launch” to the conditions of fitness concerning the rear fitment of PED machines in Taxis.
I then spent all afternoon trying to get a statement from the TfLTPH Twitter account, but as normal with important trade issues, my questions were completely ignored.
It was then left to the Chairman of Dial a Cab to break the news via the Save Our Black Taxis FaceBook account.
Apparently the details are still being finalised as new legal implications have emerged, and so the date for mandated acceptance has been moved from the 3rd of October to the end of the month 31st October.
The condition of fitness concerning rear fitted CC machines, has now been moved to 1st Jan 2017 and according to  Mr Rice, that’s official.
TfL have so far said nothing but will of course be busy letting all third parties know the new arrangements before they make an announcement to the trade.
NEWS JUST IN FROM TfLTPH :
Amazing, that just 24 hours after #SaveTaxi group meet with TfL to discuss issues and concerns over rear fitting of PEDs, TfL decide to postpone deadline
Well done ladies
A Level Playing Field…. Or Deregulation By Stealth To A One Tiered Service?

A Level Playing Field…. Or Deregulation By Stealth To A One Tiered Service?

News broke over the weekend that the DVSA were going to scrap the Taxi driver test as from December 2016.

Yes, you heard it right, after many years of calls for a more level playing field regarding the standard of driving for Taxi and private hire drivers, the DVSA, instead of calling for all private hire drivers to undertake the same driving standard requirement, have decided to scrap the Taxi driver test altogether.

The decision came out of the blue and Local Authorities were only officially informed this Tuesday.

On the face of it, the decision is unbelievable!

Over 200 Local Authorities have mandated the DVSA test as a requirement for Taxi drivers Licence.

The DVSA have a captive market for this.

The only reason I can see to relinquish this Money spinner is the Government intend to deregulate further and see this test as a barrier to new entrants (refugees) seeking to enter the trade.

I think the situation requires close scrutiny.

TfLTPH put out this statement on social media, today:

We have been advised by DVSA that they will stop delivering taxi driving tests on 31 December….

A driving test will still be a licensing requirement, but they will no longer be provided by the DVSA.’

Meanwhile in London, it is widely believed that the Government/TfL are on course for a full scale Private Hire deregulation to break the back of the Taxi trade. 

On Tuesday, TfLTPH put out a notice that the Licensed Taxi rank at the Tate Modern, installed at a cost met from the licence fee of Licensed Taxi drivers…..would be suspended to assist the dropping off of passengers arriving for he GQ magazine awards, an event attended by Mayor Sadiq  Khan.

blogger-image-1396494344

TfL’s sign, being unsigned has no legal standing.

A notice was also attached to the rank post.

What happened next was absolutely disgraceful. Far from being a place where attendees could be dropped off, it turned into a toutfest of unbooked PHVs. Taxis were stopped by marshals from using the rank, which was being used by private hire cars as a private hire rank.

While minicabs took control of the rank directly outside the main exit point if the venue, Taxis had to queue in Great Guilford Street.

The whole situation became a shambles as pre booked PH vehicles were blocked in by packs of touts. No compliance officers were visable at the location to stop the illegal plying for hire, but in a bid to save face, TfLTPH put out this series of tweets

We would stress at this point that although previously informed by TfL, not one representative from the Licensed Taxi orgs connected to the Joint Ranks Committee bothered to turn up and check out the proceedings. The unfolding saga was documented quite clearly on social media throughout the evening and into the early morning.

A colleague of Taxi Leaks phoned LTDA’s Richard Massett Wednesday afternoon, for clarification on what had transpired the previous night at the Tate Modern.

Executive committee member Massett, also chair of the Joint Ranks Committee, said he had been informed of the notice to suspend the rank, but had no idea what had happened.

Is this the best we can expect to get, after paying money to this org, to represent our best interests?

EXTRA COMMENT:

For those who find the DVSA decision confusing, this from the NPHA

Dear Members:

We sent you an email earlier today concerning the fact that we have had confirmation, from both the Department for Transport and the DVSA, that taxi assessments will not be conducted after 31 December. Any bookings made and a slot allocated before that date will go ahead.

There seems to be some confusion on this point:  the DVSA test is for taxi driving; nothing to do with vehicle testing.   Those of you whose councils already mandate the DVSA taxi driving test will know exactly what we’re referring to.  

As far as vehicle testing is concerned, that is still very much a local issue regulated by local conditions on the vehicle licence.

No doubt licensing authorities will be considering how to account for this development in their policies over the coming weeks.  If your licensing authority currently mandates the DVSA taxi driving test as a pre-condition of being granted a taxi or PHV licence – or indeed requires this for existing licence holders as well – you may wish to approach the council and make enquiries as to their future plans and requirements.

As always, we welcome your reaction and input on this matter; we have endeavoured to advise you as soon as we got confirmation.

Thank you for keeping in touch.

Best regards,

Donna D Short (Mrs)

Director/Company Secretary

National Private Hire Association

Night Tube Advert, Insults The Licence Taxi Trade….UCG Complain To Commissioner Mike Brown

Night Tube Advert, Insults The Licence Taxi Trade….UCG Complain To Commissioner Mike Brown

Offensive and Inappropriate, Night Tube Advert.

 
Mr Brown,
I am writing to you to complain about a night tube advert run by TfL that is both misleading, offensive and wholly unbecoming of TfL as the Taxi regulator.
I find it beggars believe that I should be writing such an email to a professional public body as to the tone and content of one of it’s adverts.
There is a night tube advert of which a copy of the image has been forwarded to me by one of my members genuinely upset and aggrieved at this.
Upon opening this image I too was shocked, how could an advert like this pass any type of scrutiny before being released, this of course assumes that it is thoughtless, careless and stupid rather than vexatious.
I enclose a copy below, the words that cause offence are:
THE NIGHT TUBE
Tourists and Londoners rejoice! The central and Victoria lines run at night on Fridays and Saturdays, so no more drunken 3am chats with a black-cab driver for us.
What is this supposed to mean? That Black cab drivers are drunk while driving passengers? That conversing with a black cab driver is disdainful? The very fact that a cab driver is out there driving passengers home safely (while their wives/husbands/partners are at home in bed) seems to have escaped you, we too would like to sleep at the same time as our families. Working shift patterns is stressful, places great strain on family life and complications for long term health. Many DUI attorneys recommend to check my site for more information on DUI charges and how to prevent drunk driving or you could contact legal experts from Patrick B. Courtney, P.A. firm to get help. There are lawyers from www.criminaldefenselawyervirginia.com/dui/ that can help with the legalities of such cases.
The gratitude we receive from our regulator is a disrespectful slur on our character, the fact it comes from our regulator suggests that even our regulator is subliminally telling passengers not to use us. The closing words “for us” is meant to mean what?
You do know that Londons Taxis have been driving your tube staff home late at night on discounted rates for many years. Is that what is meant by “for us”?
On behalf of the London Taxi Trade I insist that this advert and all it’s electronic images are forthwith removed immediately and a full apology made to the London Taxi Trade.
I have also made a formal complaint to the Advertising Standards Agency.
Len Martin
Chairman
United Cabbies Group
      Uber today outside Sutton Station, openly touting.
STILL THINK THERE’S A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD ?
Drivers Safety Compromised With Rear Fitted CC Readers.

Drivers Safety Compromised With Rear Fitted CC Readers.

Imagine, you pick up two or three male passengers, it’s obvious they’ve been drinking. They take you to a destination, 10 miles from the centre of London, it’s two in the morning and they direct you to a quiet, badly lit, side street.

One says “can we pay by card ? “.
He then says “it’s not working! “.
You cancel the transaction and tell him to try again, ” it’s no good…..can you come round and show me how to do this?”.
What could possibly go wrong? 
You’re in a quiet location with two passengers who you know nothing about. You get in the back and about to turn your back on them to concentrate on the CC reader.
Now imagine you are a female Taxi driver…..what do you do.?
There has been no consultation with the trade in respect to safety of the driver, male or female.
Trade representative orgs haven’t bought up the safety aspect of the new condition of fitness with TfL.
It appears the whole process has been rushed through without common sense.
Question: Apart from everything else, should TfL have the right to compromise driver safety, in favour of stakeholders with financial conflicts of interest.
To be honest, the only reason we can see for having the machine fitted in the rear compartment is to facilitate a favoured few by introducing a restriction of trade in regard to smaller suppliers who have now had to withdraw from the Taxi market.
One radio Taxi company has said the financial burden of equipping all its 1,200 vehicles could be the straw that breaks the camels back, with then disappearing from the trade completely.
Advice from TfL has been contradictory, condescending and confusing. They say we have a duty of care to assist passengers with any equipment fitted in the Taxi, then say it’s up to us to assess the situation for our own safety.
This is TfL’s official line given out on social media, although we couldn’t pin anyone down to put their name to it.
‘Given the popularity of using credit/debit cards as a means of payment in London, I believe this to be a very unlikely scenario. If a customer does experience difficultly using  the card machine, you can offer verbal advice, or you can remove the  handset from the cradle and provide assistance that  way. Ultimately it will be the drivers’ responsibility to assess the situation & decide whether it’s appropriate to enter the rear passenger compartment to resolve a payment problem.’
Typical of TfL…not one of the units we’ve seen is removable from its cradle, with getting into the rear to remove it. Some units cannot be removed by the driver.
There are more problems emerging as drivers have equipment fitted before the deadline. Machines won’t boot up, screens freeze. TfL say if your machine develops a fault, you must stop working until it’s fixed,
Many drivers have been using hand held units for many year, with no problem and no complaints from passengers.
#NoMore.
The Independent Taxi Alliance will be asking all female drivers to turn up at City Hall for a protest to coincide with  the Mayors question time. Banners will be provided curtesy of Dads Defending Daughters and the Mayfair Mob.
If you care about driver safety, whether you are female, or male, come along to City Hall and make it clear to the Mayor, you have no confidence in TfL’s handling of the Credit Card Mandate.
Not fit for purpose, Totally failing London
Editorial comment:
About Independent Taxi Alliance (ITA)
The Independent Taxi Alliance is a driver led organisation of Licensed London Taxi drivers, from all Orgs and Unions, united in a common cause.
The ITA is a proactive group of drivers from DDD, MM, LCDC, RMT, UCG, Unite, LTDA and non affiliates.
We ask no fee or subs.
And we support all Orgs, Unions and pressure groups favouring none above any other.
All members are expected to demonstrate, protest or use civil disobedience in the fight for justice.
The ITA motto:
‘Nunquam redono, nunquam deditionem’, means ‘Never give up, never surrender’.
DaC Chairman Brian Rice Says : TfL Have Got This Totally Wrong.

DaC Chairman Brian Rice Says : TfL Have Got This Totally Wrong.

There isn’t any question that having the PED in the back of the taxi could be a threat to driver safety. That is why in March 2011 we at DaC sought and obtained permission from TfL to site our PED’s in the front of the taxi, although it is wired to the taxi and gives a printed paper receipt, the PED can be passed to the passenger in the rear of the vehicle or through the luggage window and the driver remains locked in the front of the taxi.
I sought permission for the PED to be sited in the front because I was convinced at some stage TfL would mandate the acceptance of Credit Cards, which they have now done. Because, in case of any debts due to excess credit card usage IVA experts can help to sort out such issues. he difference is we at DaC understand our trade, those employed at Palestra do not!
Since the 3 March this year I have sent over thirty e-mails to TfL highlighting their error regarding having the PED in the back of the taxi and six months later they inform me that it is still being discussed!
Why are they being so pedantic about this situation? They have made a mistake and those of us that know our trade have pointed this out to them, why they choose to ignore our advice is beyond me, or is it they are so high and mighty and out of touch, they think they always know best?
They have got this totally wrong and if they persist on this disastrous course it is only a matter of time before one of our colleagues is badly injured or worse and the blame will be with TfL and they will have a huge lawsuit on their hands for negligence, especially as we can prove they were warned, but too stubborn to heed our warnings!Brian Rice