Uber Banned By Turkey

Uber Banned By Turkey

Uber is no longer allowed to operate in Turkey, a notice from the government states. Turkey believes the company is running an illegal taxi service and therefore cannot be allowed to continue without the necessary permits. Regular taxi drivers have protested against Uber, just like in many other countries.

If the service doesn’t fully cease operations, fines can be imposed against drivers and passengers. A first offence for a driver is $709 and is $80 for passengers.

Uber has 2000 registered drivers in the region and mainly operates in Istanbul.

It appears the company will fight this order.

Uber to pay $20m to ‘misled’ drivers

Uber to pay $20m to ‘misled’ drivers

Between January and March 2015, ride-sharing service Uber put out ads on Craigslist in the hope of attracting new drivers by offering attractive hourly rates of pay.

In Boston, for example, it told potential drivers they would earn $25 an hour.

In truth, fewer than 10% of drivers in the city actually managed to bring in that amount, according to a lawsuit brought by the US Federal Trade Commission.

In separate statements pushed out to the media and posted on its own site, Uber said “the potential income a driver on UberX can make in a year is more than $90,000 in New York and more than $74,000 in San Francisco”.

The FTC said the median amount earned in those cities – for drivers working a 40 hour week – was significantly less ($29,000 and $21,000 less, respectively).

The FTC listed 18 cities across the US where it said Uber was painting a far more lucrative picture than was realistic. In Baltimore, fewer than 20% of drivers earned $16 an hour. Chicago – fewer than 20% earned $21. Minneapolis – 10%, $18. And so on.

‘Cost, risk and burden’

On Thursday, Uber agreed to pay $20m to those drivers in order to settle the claim. Quite how it will do that it isn’t yet clear, but the FTC has ordered the company to work with it to find a way.

The company said its settlement didn’t constitute an admission of guilt, disputing the way the FTC calculated its figures.

The company said it has modified the way in which it advertises potential earnings to new recruits – but would not go into further detail.

“We’re pleased to have reached an agreement with the FTC,” a spokeswoman said.

“We’ve made many improvements to the driver experience over the last year and will continue to focus on ensuring that Uber is the best option for anyone looking to earn money on their own schedule.”

Drivers complain, however, that the improvements to the driver experience do not extend to covering the costs of running and maintaining a car.

“The reality of being a ride-sharing driver is a far cry from the rosy picture these apps describe and it is encouraging to see the FTC take them to task and refund drivers,” said Jim Conigliaro from the Independent Drivers Guild.

“Companies like Uber shift cost, risk, and burden onto drivers and taxpayers when they fail to provide the basic benefits so many Americans take for granted, from health insurance to sick leave.

“On top of that, drivers are stuck with the bill for their vehicle, gas, repairs, maintenance, insurance, the list goes on.”

The FTC also criticised Uber over the financing options it gave to drivers interested in leasing a car via the company.

The regulator said drivers were paying an average of $200 per week – higher than first advertised. Money to pay the lease is automatically taken from a driver’s earnings.

 

Source: BBC

Anyone Can Hold The Helm When The Sea Is Calm……..by Semtex.

Anyone Can Hold The Helm When The Sea Is Calm……..by Semtex.

 There was a hell of a lot to learn about the Great London Cab Trade this week, and not just regarding our access to the Bank Junction.

When I stood on the steps of the Royal Exchange on one of our turnouts last week, a chap wearing a suit asked if I knew what it was all about. After explaining to him, his reply was ” Well there is work all over London for you guys, why worry about this little bit?”

But the truth is, its not about ‘this little bit’ is it ? Excluding us from a central hub of the City of London, is merely the thin edge of the wedge. It is also I believe, part of the game plan structure to starve our trade into extinction.

This is not about my personal paranoia or our trade being dramatic, Transport For London without doubt, want shot of us. For good.

Once the Bank Junction is won for them, then it will be Tottenham Court  Road, then Oxford Street, then the whole of the City, then Knightsbridge………………until 25,000 of us are hemmed in around Soho, starving to death.

So the Battle of the Bank Junction this week, was far more than a group of sulking cab drivers, whingeing about petty infringements and the threat of losing ‘this little bit.’

For me though, the one major point that came out of all this week was how impotent some of our trade organisations were, in a call of trade emergency.

And for reasons stated above, the Bank Demo’s may not have appeared as an emergency, but history will prove that it certainly was.

The thing that I found so poignant and symbolic though, was watching our staunch, passionate Irishman friend, (who’s name I have deliberately held back,) go onto the pavement and rally the troops in a display of heart, passion, spunk and commitment. The faces of our colleagues looking up to him, rallying and applauding, choked me up for several reasons.

One of the reasons of course, is that our impromptu understudy ‘leader’ just jumped in and took up the helm. He wasn’t asked to. he hadn’t been elected to, but he just did it. He did it because he saw the cavernous gap that has somehow shown its gaping void, in a battered trade who have decided that enough is enough, and in the absence of a General, chose to lead themselves.

In all the time I have had my badge, never have I seen a display of self preservation and fight back from rank and file drivers, as I have seen at the Bank Junction this week.

The officially unrecognised special forces of the Independent Taxi Alliance, Dads Defending Daughters and the great Mayfair Mob, using word of mouth, secret codes and tungsten camaraderie showing the way forward, and displaying that it is themselves who are the Pathfinders and future of our survival.

What interests me so much though, is that our trade is known for having so many ‘Leaders’, when the waters are calm.  There are miles too many trade representation organisations for a mere 25,000 membership, yet when the call went out for a red alert deployment…………the vacancy for a  Brigadier was worryingly apparent! The silence was deafening.  And it took a rank and file colleague and one of our own to stand proud, jump up to the plate and take the helm.

Could you imagine the same sort of thing happening at an RMT rally when the late Bob Crow was alive ? Can you imagine a face coming out of the crowd and upstaging Bob’s rallying speech ? Don’t spend another second considering it.

But it happened at the Bank junction in our trade this week, simply because there was nobody else willing to do it.

I don’t want to waste time and damage trade morale in slating Trade Orgs and drivers who work when the rest of us are fighting, but to me, these acts speak volumes for us all and our future, if we are to have one.

Whatsmore, looking at the crowd gathered on the pavement as our Irishman mate captivated the crowd, one could have been forgiven for thinking they were viewing footage from a demo long gone. But no, your eyes were not deceiving you, it was indeed the same faces, the same supporters and the same trade loyal fighters, that are there time after time after time.

The trade small fry showed the big boys how it should be done this week, and have nobody to thank for their success, but themselves. They did themselves proud, they did us all proud.

On another good note, it is good to see that our trade ally and RMT’s Taxi Branch Secretary, Lewis Norton has secured a meeting with the City of London for some ‘dialogue’, in the wake of our Demo’s.

Regular readers of Taxileaks will know my opinion of dialogue, but I must admit, that it would be foolish to turn down this offer.

However, and Lewis will not need me to advise him I’m sure, that the planned dialogue needs to be constructive with genuine and wilful intent for our trade’s benefit when dealing with the hierarchy.

We as a trade know only too well in our history, that ‘Dialogue’ can very easily be traded for blah, blah, blah, waffle, spiel and empty promise.

The biggest fear for me, and a ruse that has so often been cast upon our trade, is that the offer of dialogue isn’t used as an Operation Mincemeat deflection trick.

City Hall and TFL need to be monitored and overseen by the cab trade’s covert surveillance teams, to ensure that no activity is deployed from the back door, as we attempt to work out a deal at the front.

So many times in the past have our regulators have chucked out a mackerel for us to concentrate on, and then clobbered us with another pasting, when our eyes were on the dummy ball. TFL and City Hall don’t abide by the rules of cricket and are well known for tactical deception strategies and suspicion.

So far so good then, we shall have to see what awaits us. I bid our colleague Lewis Norton well in the meeting and hope our trade gets the access that we trained and qualified for.

If not, I’m certain that our ‘special forces’ will have no problem deploying again, and again, and again, should be feel that we are being abused and bullied further.

Well done to our ITA, DDD, Mayfair Mob and the battalions of leaderless colleagues this week. It shows what can be done when we try.

To all of our ‘Leaders’ out there the message is simple………..Anyone Can Hold The Helm When The Sea Is Calm !

Be lucky all.

8829 Semtex.

London Stalling – a report on London’s congestion by the GLA

London Stalling – a report on London’s congestion by the GLA

Holding the Mayor to account and investigating issues that matter to Londoners

Over a decade ago, London led the world by introducing a Congestion Charge in the centre of the city. The scheme has proven successful, keeping a lid on private motor traffic and creating new space for buses, cyclists and pedestrians on the busiest part of our road network. Congested cities around the globe looked to London as they considered how to tackle the gridlock on their own streets.

However, congestion has begun to increase sharply again, and not just in central London but across the capital. Traffic has slowed down and road users are spending longer stuck in delays. Buses have become so unreliable that usage has begun to fall, after many years of growth. The causes of this change are complex and multiple, as our investigation has identified.

What is clear is that the current Congestion Charge is no longer fit for purpose – it is a blunt instrument using old technology that covers a tiny part of London. Fundamentally, vehicles should be charged according to their impact on congestion. Charging a daily flat rate to enter a zone may discourage some people from using part of the road network, but

this approach is failing to target vehicles spending longer on the roads, at the most congested times, and travelling in other areas where congestion is high.

We recommend in this report that the Mayor should make plans now to introduce road pricing in London. This idea has long been discussed, but until now the political will to make it happen has been lacking. Delaying further is not an option. There are a number of options for how this happens, which TfL will need to work out, including the geographical scope, monitoring technology and integration with Vehicle Excise Duty and the Mayor’s emissions charges. In the interim, immediate reform of the existing Congestion Charge to target it at journeys causing congestion would be worthwhile.

There is a range of other measures that could also help to tackle congestion. The Mayor could do more to reduce the impact of roadworks, strengthen the on-street response to major traffic incidents, and encourage Londoners to receive personal deliveries in more sustainable ways. However these measures alone will not be enough to tackle London’s congestion problem

To Read the report please click here London stalling

Source LCDC.uk

Blockade at the bank Day 4 : New Day, New Plan…. By Jim Thomas

Blockade at the bank Day 4 : New Day, New Plan…. By Jim Thomas

After the police slapped a section 14 on the Demo at the Bank, organisers decided to throw a curve ball in retaliation to the 30 minute restriction and changed the venue for day 3 to Parliament Square.

The Met Police had already put into operation restriction around the Bank Junction and were left red faced as no one turned up. At first they thought they had beaten the protesters but it soon became clear, the boot was on the other foot.

Westminster was gridlocked for best part of an hour till the traffic police turned up. They then made a catastrophic mistake in funnelling the Taxis over Westminster Bridge which unbeknown to them added the procession of taxes to their preordained second target… the Waterloo IMAX round about.

Waterloo bridge soon became gridlocked along with Westminster. York Road was proper engines off and north of the river the Aldwych tailed back into the City’s square mile.

Again traffic cops turned up and tried to disperse the protesters by waving them back across Waterloo bridge.

The convoy then moved on to the third venue, again hitting the Rotunda at London Wall before the signal was given to disperse for the day.

Then came the bully boy tactics. As they had been given the run around, some Met officers were telling drivers “you are being filmed, and if you are filmed in multiple locations tomorrow, TfL will prosecute you”.

This is a ridiculous statement as this is exactly what Taxi drivers do….they ply their trade in multiple locations every day… this scaremongering doesn’t hold water, and (so I’m told) today, the fight goes on.

On the City Police Website last night, they said:

“Conditions for the Taxi demos are in place to limit the disruption across London and to ensure emergency vehicles can access all routes.”

So far, they haven’t issued a new section 14 limiting the time of assembly.

The ITA Twitter account have broken their silence tonight to confirm Demo will take place at Bank Junction at 3pm on the dot.

Tanni Grey Thompsom says sh will raise this issue on behalf of disabled passengers.

Editorial Comment :

It is now widely believed that the proposed ban traffic at the Bank Junction has a hidden agenda and is not to make the junction safer.

Safety has nothing to do with the restrictions, if that were the case, then Buses and Cyclist would have been banned.

It’s alleged this experiment is being forced on London to facilitate the movement of construction trucks and heavy plant, while work takes place on the two new skyscrapers are erected. It’s also alleged, heavy plant and lorries will be issued permits to use the Junction while all other traffic apart from buses and bikes will be excluded.

So far, the demos have been an overwhelming success. Taxi Leaks has been informed that further action is being planned to continue in to the next couple of weeks.