CAB CHAT RADIO SHOW E114 14-11-2016

CAB CHAT RADIO SHOW E114 14-11-2016

CAB CHAT RADIO SHOW E114 14-11-2016

HOSTED THIS WEEK BY:
@SUPERCABBY, @GENTLEMANCABBIE, @SEANPAULDAY & @MACTHECAB

Special Guest:

@HarryWall64

Issues Discussed this week:

Normality is restored to Cab CHat with SuperCabby back at the controls!

Sean Paul Day turns up late for the show as usual!

Stansted Airport Drop Off point ripping off drivers, £3 for 5 minutes in the drop off zone and if you go over 5 minutes the charge rises to £50. Is this discriminating against the disabled?

Sadiq Khan vowed to clamp down on Uber! We will hear his exact words later in the show

TFL Enforcement have been instructed to come down hard on Taxi drivers!

Tuesday’s demo, do you think it achieved the expected effect?

More Prius’s go up in flames and yet TPH are silent and no recall or revilement of licenses

Taxi Point to close due to the developers of the App software closing down, a great loss to the trade.

Taxi App having great success in their first month, over 250 jobs go through the system in only its third weekend

TFL still not released the sexual assault statistics!

Karhoo on the brink of collapse and seeking further investment

Drivers warned to be careful around the Lisson Grove area as the attacks continue

Drivers are warned of possible credit card scam where the passenger removes the card before the transaction is completed

Uber propose to launch flying taxis!

GMB are calling for the rule stopping drivers from purchasing taxis from outside of London to be repealed.

Another London Cab Drivers badge for sale on Ebay had bids of £62,000

Insurance company Black Boxes giving false data and incorrect positional information, doesn’t bode well for driverless cars

TFL stating that drivers will save £5000 per year with a Zero emissions vehicle, are they for real? How much does the average driver spend on diesel?

Val Shawcross tells Lewis Norton that TFL intend the license Pedicabs

Callers to the Show this week:

Drumslayer

And Much More…………

Email: cabchat@gmail.com
Tel: 020 8144 8294
http://londontaxiradio.co.uk

London Taxi Radio’s new format radio show. Hosted by SuperCabby, MacTheCab, SeanPaulDay, TheHolbornCab, @GentlemanCabbie & @Iamcabman they share their views and opinions of the London Taxi Trade interspersed with music and Jingles.

London Taxi Radio is an New Digital Media initiative incorporating an online radio station, podcasts, Youtube channel, photographs and video footage

Letter To Taxi News : Harry Wall Points Out TfL Board Members Conflicts Of Interest.

Letter To Taxi News : Harry Wall Points Out TfL Board Members Conflicts Of Interest.

Top row Kahn, Kalifa, bottom row, Sloman Liebreich
Jamie Hawes works out of Heathrow and recently discovered the credit card machines TFL have approved for cabs were supplied by Worldpay, whose vice chairman happens to be a Ron Kalifa.
This man is also a newly drafted in member of the TFL board.
Obviously, he and Worldpay stand to earn a considerable chunk of money from this but, for some reason, TFL failed to mention it when they announced plans to force this on us.
This got me thinking so I decided to do some digging myself.
I looked at TFL’s board members including their registered interests and found some interesting stuff.
Firstly:
Sadiq Khan is Chair.
His brother Arif works for Hays Recruitment and has been assigned to TFL as an infrastructure engineer.
He’s brother-in-law, Tahir Ahmad is director of Project Leaders LTD, a management consultancy with Network Rail.
Second:
Ron Kalifa, as stated above is vice chairman of Worldpay.
This is a card payment company that TFL has approved for use in cabs. What I discovered was that he has an interest in the growth of contactless payments and pre-pay cards, something TFL have been keen to promote.
Third: Dr. Lynn Sloman.
She’s founder and director of Transport for Quality of Life and specialises in all things green.
Amongst her company’s clients are Department of Transplant UK, London Borough of Southwark and curiously ASLEF, RMT, TSSA and Unite.
She’s also a board member of cycling England.
Fourth:
Michael Liebreich.
Chairman of Bloomberg Advisory Board of New Energy Finance.
He’s also a director of Pearlshare, a travel app but more interesting is that he’s a director of Chargepoint Inc.
This is a company based in US and supplies charging stations for electric vehicles, it’s one of the largest vehicle charging networks in the world.
Any alarm bells ringing??
In plan sight, see all the TfL board members and links to conflicts of interests. >CLICK HERE <
Add to this lot in pic number three, paragraph 3.4 you’ll notice that Bob Oddy and Steve Wright have been removed and are no longer on the board of TFL. They have not been replaced with anyone from the Taxi trade.
So in summary, in-spite of his promise to save the cab trade, Sadiq Khan has
• Sorted his family out, brought a man in to force in the CC issue and fleece us of thousands
• Bought in a woman who is obviously green mad and bent on making London a cyclists paradise whilst strangling it to death.
• Appointed another who’s destined to make millions from installing charging stations that we’ll be paying for to power up the cabs we’re being forced to buy.
And all of this is happening without any representation from our trade being allowed on the TFL board.
Now, in light of what you’ve just read can anyone honestly feel that Sadiq is still our man?
The right people are being menouvered into the right positions in order to slam shut any possibility of a return to the trade we remember.
The media once again slammed us for disrupting people’s lives last Tuesday, with never a mention of the shattered wreckage of our lives left from the wake of 16 failed TFL years.
I don’t believe Tuesday’s demo was the success it hailed to be.
The police controlled it from start to finish with great effect. Those in Whitehall were naturally jubilant at their efforts, especially delivering a letter to no.10 as they should be but London was not locked up as it should’ve been and in that respect I was disappointed as were others.
Add to that the drivers (scabs) that were working despite a demo state being obvious and I think a new approach needs to be put into motion.
It’s plain to see TFL, Khan and co. have no interest in us whatsoever.
As with all politicians, his promises were obviously made just for the campaign and in reality complete bullshit, there’s no other explanation.
TfL are still churning out an extra 600+ PH per week, still Uber accidents each day, etc, etc. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS CHANGED.!!
Christmas is looming which will be closely followed by January, eventually followed by May with Uber’s license renewal date. I’d say if we carry on with the current plan of being good, predictable little cabbie chappies that renewal is cut and dried.
We need to change tack, take back control of demos, control of our ranks and control of our future.
The orgs are bound by procedures, due process, rules, regulations and time, they do their best. But time is a luxury we don’t have.
We must make what little we have left count.
It’s clear to so many people that we need to bring London’s corporate giant down to a fair fighting level, one where the odds and laws are not stacked in their favour.
A fair level playing field with everyone playing to the same rules, that’s all we want. Up to now we tried to use the law to fight our corner but it’s failed and I think we’ve been duped into the trick of misdirection.
While we’ve gone down the legal route, our enemies have been laying the groundwork for their future in our trade, e.g., Worldpay and Chargepoint Inc.
I was recently described as an angry man, I am.
I’m angry at TFL, Uber, the general publics desertion of us, the orgs, those within our trade who’ve not proved as genuine as they should….But most of all I’m ashamed at the cab trade for allowing this to happen.
The trade’s full of fairly hard men who stand for no nonsense at all yet as a trade, with the obvious exception of the demonstration faithful, we really are gutless. Much to TFL’s joy.
As a New Years resolution can we all do something that I’ve never seen in 23 years and actually come together, stand up and fight for something we all earned the right to do on the Knowledge.
Show some bulldog spirit and take our future back from those greedy, vile, thieving bastards who suck the lifeblood from the working class because nobody says no.
If we all say no and stand firm 2017 could be a good year instead of just being insignificant like last year, and the year before that.
The orgs will say great strives have been made and to some degree that’s true, but it’s not enough because we’re still struggling.
As I’ve said many times before, we have no friends in high places so it’s all down to us.
On Sunday we had the remembrance services in Whitehall, a day of pride and remembrance and as usual hundreds of cabbies gave up their time to ferry old soldiers round London free of charge, but you won’t see that in City AM.
You will see the disruption we caused on Tuesday though because that’s what we’re up against, the power of misdirection illustrated right there.
The media have that power but if we create so much disruption, in much greater numbers they can’t ignore us when we try and get our points across.
The damage we could inflict on London could be so severe the public would demand an in depth explanation, therefore giving all media outlets no option but to allow us to speak unhindered.
Perhaps I’m talking crap but we’re no further forward than we were this time last year, so what have we got to lose?
Drive safe and be lucky
Harry Wall.
How the Karhoo taxi app ended up running on empty

How the Karhoo taxi app ended up running on empty

Halloween itself was to be payday at the supposedly well-funded start-up that included post-settlement funding service, which was reported to have raised $250m a year earlier and had been occupying swanky new offices at 55 Baker Street in central London since June. The week before the huddle, chief executive Daniel Ishag had assured senior staff the company was expecting an imminent $5m injection from investors. It seemed to be business as usual.

Instead, Karhoo’s chief financial officer Dynshaw Italia told about 60 assembled employees they would not be paid on Monday and Karhoo’s money had all but run out. Mr Ishag was meeting investors in Singapore at the time and has not been seen in the London offices since that day.

“There was no reason not to trust them until the rug gets pulled out from under you and they tell you you’re not being paid, and oh yeah, there is only $10,000 left in the account,” an employee at the company said, who did not wish to be named. “It was a ‘What the f**k!’ moment.”

Karhoo is a taxi comparison app that provides users with access to minicabs and taxis run by established operators such as New York private hire operators Carmel and Dial 7, and the UK’s largest minicab company Addison Lee. Unlike its rival Uber, it does not sign up individual drivers — it just plugs in the services of existing companies into its app and takes a cut of the bookings.

According to the company, the app had been downloaded 300,000 times and had revenues of slightly less than $1m in its first 12 weeks of operation in London. But Karhoo was operating in a hyper-competitive market where cash could be burnt through quickly, with heavy subsidising of rides to win market share.

After a week of struggling to plug the hole with new investors as noted here, Karhoo ceased tradingon November 7, just six months after its service first launched. Mr Ishag and his cousin David Ishag, Karhoo’s chairman had both stepped down at the end of last month.

The service, which had workers in London, New York, Tel Aviv, Miami, Los Angeles and Singapore, said in a statement that “many of them have worked unpaid for the last six weeks in an effort to get the business to a better place”.

Staff that spoke to the Financial Times said their biggest question was how the company had burnt through the reported $250m so quickly. The app’s backers included well-known individuals such as David Kowitz, co-founder of Indus Capital Partners, the US hedge fund; Jonathan Feuer, managing partner at CVC Capital Partners, the European private equity group; and Eric Daniels, the former chief executive of Lloyds Banking Group.

At the time of launch, a company spokesman indicated to the FT that Karhoo had already raised hundreds of millions of dollars, and was on track to exceed $300m. “Karhoo is currently in discussions with several parties to raise in excess of $300m, and we expect this to rise to more than $1bn in around 18 months’ time,” he said last October.

In an FT interview this week, Daniel Ishag denied the company had ever had $250m at its disposal. “We did not raise $250m, that was a misconception,” the 42-year-old founder said. “Since inception, $52m has gone into the business. If you look at the Lyfts and Ubers of this world, they had spent in the region of half a billion dollars to get 200,000 drivers, so it just goes to show our efficiencies.”

But a senior staff member maintained: “Karhoo did not fail to deliver rides or suppliers, it was run to the ground by a ludicrous lack of corporate governance.”

According to Mr Ishag, existing investors who had promised Karhoo funding were unable to deliver in the time span promised. “There was a crucial $5m that didn’t come in. That’s what derailed our entire process and changed it into a crisis overnight,” he said. “It was only a couple of days before we informed employees that alarm bells started going off.”

David Kowitz, one of the investors, doubted whether any additional financing was promised to Mr Ishag. “Financing is never sure until it arrives in your account. I don’t know of anything that was ‘promised’ that didn’t arrive,” he said via email.

Several other investors contacted by the FT were either unavailable or declined to comment.

On October 28, the same day Karhoo’s London staff were informed they would not be paid, Karhoo was sued by a New York-based customer service company called Modsquad for failing to pay more than $600,000 for its services between June and October. “Yes, a case was brought. We had a cash crunch and we believed we had money coming in to cover everything,” Mr Ishag said.

Although he insists that Karhoo had spent its cash just as any growing start-up would, on hiring and opening five offices across three continents, there are suggestions of profligacy — the company had leased prime real estate in London and Park Avenue South in the Chelsea neighbourhood of New York City. Karhoo also rented three apartments in Manhattan for personal use by senior company management.

Mr Ishag explained that he got a “phenomenal deal from both landlords” who wanted to make their buildings tech hubs, and that renting three flats was cheaper than frequently staying in a hotel in New York.

While its workforce debates whether Karhoo was a victim of fierce subsidy battles, reckless spending or a funding gap, the company has been wound down completely. This week, the new management appointed accountants David Rubin and Partners as administrators to salvage any remaining assets and sent home more than 180 employees worldwide. With the assistance from the Remote Quality Bookkeeping services, this task was easy to achieve.

Staff now say they should have seen the warning signs earlier. Another employee commented: “When you look back, there were chinks in the armour. Thousands of pounds worth of promotional codes given to customers every week is lunacy. There was a lot of vanity here.”

Source: Financial Times

More cabbies are set to hit Melbourne’s streets after taxi industry’s knowledge test is scrapped

More cabbies are set to hit Melbourne’s streets after taxi industry’s knowledge test is scrapped

In August, when the State Government announced that it would legalise ride-sharing, the taxi industry’s knowledge test — based on London’s ­famous test for black cab drivers — was scrapped.

Since then, 5045 people have applied to the Taxi ­Services Commission to be ­accredited as taxi drivers, compared with 5956 for the whole of 2015-16 and just 3957 for 2014-15. The increasing numbers of taxi drivers should put more cabs on the road, around the clock, providing greater competition for ride-sharing service Uber.

Melbourne’s biggest taxi company, 13 CABS, said it had hired more drivers in the past two months than it had in two years while the knowledge test had been a requirement.

Last month, 13 CABS inducted 471 drivers, compared with 59 the previous October. In September, 608 were handed keys, compared with just 43 the previous September. 13 CABS chief operating officer Stuart Overell said: “Ultimately, now we have more taxis on the road because before we were only managing to do one shift. Taxis were previously parked when everyone wanted to get home at night.”

He said there would now be no tolerance for those taxi drivers who failed to satisfy their passengers.

“With more drivers, we have more opportunity to ­remove the bad ones out of the system because there is more choice,” Mr Overell said. “Those with bad ratings or feedback will be taken off the road.”

Mr Overell said that the cost and difficulty of the knowledge test had been a turn-off for many aspiring taxi drivers.

The test had been one of the industry reforms introduced by the Napthine Coalition government in 2014.

Applicants had to get 85 per cent of the questions correct in each of three separate modules to secure a licence.

In a trade-off for the improved standard, cabbies were given a larger slice of earnings: a minimum of 55 per cent of the fare box, compared with the previous 50-50 split.

But the test, on suburb locations, general knowledge and customer service, proved too difficult — in its first two months, only one in 234 applicants passed.

When figures did not improve, the TSC modified the test, distributed a handbook to help candidates prepare, and gave them eight attempts to pass rather than two. TSC chief executive Aaron de Rozario said that since the changes in August, the industry regulator’s office opening hours had been “modified” to cater for the “considerable ­increase” in walk-ins.

“As a regulator, our priority is safety, and it’s good to see more drivers getting police checks and getting accredited,” Mr de Rozario said.

Source: Herald Sun

All Our Problems Can Be Solved By Enforcing Existing Legislation – But Only If TfL Wish To Do So.

All Our Problems Can Be Solved By Enforcing Existing Legislation – But Only If TfL Wish To Do So.

Letter from Gerry O’Leary.

All the problems we face, can be solved by TfL and the enforcement authorities using the existing legislation – but only if they wish to do so.

Spartacus hit the nail on the head when he said “it’s my view that they are implementing national ‘standards’ for PH as proposed by the Law Commission by stealth”

Among the ‘standards’ is the unlawful allowing of plying for hire by licensed private hire vehicles.

In 2010, Manchester Airport told a Commons committee that it had introduced a second on-demand taxi service – something which it could not lawfully do because in Greater Manchester only hackney carriages can ply for hire at airports or car parks.

Not only did the Licensing Authority (Manchester City Council) fail to enforce the law, but it advised the airport on measures it could take to avoid the attentions of MCC enforcement officers.

Manchester City Council gets about £12m a year in dividends from its stake in the airport, which in turn benefits from its percentage cut from the takings of its chosen private hire operator. Talk about having a dog in the race!

To make matters worse, the council has gone further by allowing chosen private hire firms to ply for hire in car parks at pop concerts.

The excuse they give is that plying for hire (a criminal offence under the Town Police Clauses Act, 1847) doesn’t occur until a driver takes a booking which contravenes the LGMPA Act of 1976.
This is NEW law, introduced without the involvement of parliament or the courts.

It is dangerous nonsense because it removes from the licensing authority the power to act against criminals and predators who use their private hire licences to prey on victims elsewhere in the city. You can understand more about this if you hire criminal attorney defending your rights in Denver. 

The rule of law, which used to protect the public against arbitrary decision-making by bureaucrats, has been eroded to the point where a coach and horses has been ridden over the law – by bureaucrats who have been entrusted to uphold that law.

The government would prefer not to touch this matter with a bargepole and neither would local politicians because the neoconservative ideology of the free market has taken such a grip of politicians that they reject any regulation as “red tape” that must be removed by hook or by crook, even if that means acting unlawfully.