Today’s UCG Protest In Oxford Street : Interview With UCG Chairman Len Martin.

Len Martin, Chair of the United Cabbies Group speaks about the reasons behind today’s Oxford Street Demo on London Live.

                             TODAYS DEMO : 

AND WE DIDNT HAVE TO WAIT TOO LONG

Garret Emmerson went straight on radio and stated:

That TfL was the gold standard in Taxi regulation…lol

And, TfL had managed to cut touting in London by 77%….lol

This man can’t open his mouth without spouting scripted nonsense.

     Photos from Twitter feed

Uber faces lawsuit after ‘refusing to take guide dogs’

Lawsuit cites one instance in which an Uber driver allegedly refused a blind woman’s plea to pull over once she realised he had locked her guide dog in the boot of his car

Uber app in Berlin

Uber drivers allegedly yelled ‘no dogs’ at riders Photo: AFP

Uber must defend itself against a lawsuit accusing the popular ride-sharing service of discriminating against blind people by refusing to transport guide dogs, a judge has ruled. It is better to get them enrolled to Spectrum Canine Dog Training before they are fit to transport through any modes of vehicles. People can check out https://k9answers.com/programs/ this link for the best dog training services.

US Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins, in San Jose, California, said the plaintiffs could pursue a claim that Uber was a “travel service” subject to potential liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The judge also rejected Uber’s arguments that the plaintiffs, including the National Federation of the Blind of California, lacked standing to sue under the ADA and state laws protecting the disabled.

Uber was given 14 days to formally respond to the complaint.

Worth an estimated $40bn (£26.8bn), Uber said it offers its mobile phone taxi-hailing service in more than 270 cities and geographic areas in 56 countries, and can charge varying prices based on demand.

But the San Francisco-based company has faced complaints across the world over how it pays drivers, treats passengers and ensures safety.

In the discrimination case, the plaintiffs said federal law requires operators of taxi services such as Uber to carry service animals for blind riders but that it knows of more than 40 instances in which Uber drivers refused.

They cited two instances in which Uber drivers allegedly yelled “no dogs” at riders, and another where an Uber driver allegedly refused a blind woman’s plea to pull over once she realised he had locked her guide dog in the boot of his car. Also, if you’re looking for dog-friendly restaurants in Denver, you can check  out some options here!

In seeking to dismiss the case, Uber said the individual plaintiffs were required to arbitrate their claims.

Uber also said it was “on the cutting edge of expanding accessibility” for the disabled, and that claims it failed to accommodate blind people with service animals had no merit.

The United Cabbies Group Have called a protest tomorrow at 14:00hrs on Oxford St.

We have called this protest to raise awareness for the recent excellent GLA report “Future Proof” We do not want this report to slowly sink off the radar, so we are raising public awareness for the dangers to public safety as outlined in the recent GLA report.

Also a point of note, we (UCG) chose the venue of Oxford St so as not to cause disruption to the public as only taxis and buses are allowed on Oxford St during daytime hours. So as to cause as little public disruption as possible we chose this route and outside rush hour too.

However we have been told that we are only allowed 15 Minutes to protest by the police because TfL believe we will cause public disruption. We have contacted Liberty the campaign for human rights and they are aware of our plight. They will take this up on our behalf if the Police prevent us from staging an effective protest.

“An Ordinance for the Regulation of Hackney-Coachmen in London and the places adjacent” was approved by Parliament in 1654. The first hackney-carriage licences date from 1662, and applied literally to horse-drawn carriages, later modernised as hansom cabs (1834)

During the 20th century, Motor engined Taxis replaced horse-drawn models, and the last horse-drawn hackney carriage ceased service in London in 1947.

UK regulations define a hackney carriage as a taxicab allowed to ply the streets looking for passengers to pick up, as opposed to private hire vehicles (sometimes called minicabs), which may pick up only passengers who have previously booked or who visit the taxi operator’s office.

The metropolitan police were the guardians and licensing authority of the London Taxi trade until Ken Livingstone as Mayor placed the responsibility for licensing and regulating Londons Taxis under TfL in 2000.

This was the catalyst for the worlds finest Taxi trades’ decline into the dire state the Taxi trade finds itself in today. Over the last 14 years TfL under the responsibility of Mayor Boris Johnson have either introduced policies that have been both detrimental and devastaing to the Licensed London Taxi Trade, or failed miserably to ensure the survival of the gold standard taxi service that is a “London Black Cab”.

For many years Londons Taxi Trade Organisations have written to TfL repeatedly asking for a level playing field and the law to be upheld. TfL ignore all such correspondence or “fob off” the respondee with “policy Statements and denials”

Here we outline the main (But by no means only) issues we have with TfL and their (quote from the GLA report) “Woefully inadequate” performance.

Unlicensed Pedicabs Carrying Passengers, unregulated and uninsured.

These are dangerous and in a recent TV documentary were found to be charging Arabic visitors to London £200 from Marble Arch to Oxford Circus.

These are a public Menace, yet the authorities claim nothing can be done. It is stated that they fall through a loop hole in the law. They do not, in a court case where a rickshaw operator was taken to court as an unlicensed Hackney Carriage (Bugs Bugs V Oddy) the judge decided they were Stage Carriages. However, you require a license to operate a stage carriage. If the authorities were serious about removing this menace they would arrest three rickshaws and charge them accordingly.

1. Charge the first rickshaw as an Unlicensed Hackney carriage

2. Charge the second rickshaw as an Unlicensed Stage Carriage

3. Charge the third rickshaw as an Unlicensed street trader

They must be one of those three things…. But they don’t have the politcal will to do so. SO we have unsafe uninsured and unregulated rickshaws ripping off members of the public and overseas visitors.

Safe for public carriage? Click here to watch a passenger falling out of one onto the pavement, if she had fallen out into the carriageway and a bus was overtaking?

Click this link

TfL dropped the requirement for planning permission of “Satellite Booking Offices” these are known to be frequented by touts and now there is evidence they are being taken over by organised crime syndicates, Mary Dowde of TfL (Who has since left TfL) removed the requirement for planning permission for these because they (TfL) knew they would be controversial.

Here is the result, TfL licensed an alleyway 200 metres from a police station. They (TfL) are guilty of a dereliction of duty of care to the public safety; this is heavily criticsed in the GLA report.

TfL Licensed an Alley Click Here for the Video

The result of this policy?…. Sexual Assaults in Minicabs rising at an alarming rate

TfL and the police turn a “blind eye” to illegal touting particularly outside nightclubs, this posses a serious threat to public safety, Chris Huhne’s (ex MP) daughter was first touted and then sexually assaulted in a minicab (PHV) by Such touts that operate outside a well known London Night Club.

Some Minicabs (AKA PHV) have been found to be driving on social domestic and pleasure insurance that specifically excludes hire for reward, this means these passengers are uninsured. TfL have no mechanism to ensure the correct type of insurance is in force without physically stopping the driver and asking to see the document. All taxis are required by law to display the correct insurance on the partition wall.

Some Minicabs are being driven by drivers who have had no back ground checks, TfL insist that a certificate of good conduct is required, but these will not be available for refugees or assylum seekers. We were informed that an undercover journalist managed to purchase one of these from a corrupt official in a foreign country for just £130.

What isn’t clear to us is…. If you are a refugee of a war torn state, will the officials of that country be in a position to provide this information? what records would they need to see to know who you were? if you are a genuine refugee you are probably here with just the shirt on your back, how likely is it you will have your birth certificate? passport? Ultility bill ? And what of an Assylum seeker? we presume you are on the run from the state because that state is posing a serious threat to your safety… and they are going to provide you with a certificate of good conduct? The mind boggles at the sheer naivety of some policy makers.

Try and get a job as a school teacher or nurse on one of these and see how far you get. Yet we are placing vunerable females (perhaps having been drinking alcohol) alone with these people at 3am in the back of a minicab? We have approximately 75,000 minicab drivers in London, many of them are empty most of the night such is the over supply, why then if they aren’t desperately needed would you take the chance? This is a serious risk to public safety and it is TfL policy to continue this practise.

Both the Taxi trade AND the licensed PHV trade are calling for a minimum residency of three years before a PHV driver is allowed to apply for a license. If this is implemented then a three year history of conduct is known and a DBS (was called CRB) certificate can be issued.

Daily Express article here

Daily Mail article Article

Here’s what the recent GLA report had to say about TfL as the regulator of the UK’s largest taxi and private hire fleet…

“You now break the law or breach the regulations, and TfL, if you are big enough, will change the rules.”

“Illegal touting by both licensed and unlicensed private hire operators and drivers is rampant and evident across large parts of London every single evening, and this is allowed to continue unchecked.”

‘Satellite offices’ are an example of how a well-intentioned policy has turned out to cause more problems than it solves”

“were not operators at all and were often the very people who were ‘aiding and abetting’, illegal activity and touting”. The Association, along with the taxi trade, have continued to express their anger at TfL’s continuation of the policy despite repeated warnings from both trades.

“It is very difficult for enforcement officers to then differentiate between the genuine compliant passenger who has booked their fare inside the club…versus the inappropriate behaviour by some operators which TfL, the police and ourselves have witnessed…. I do not think they are helpful in terms of trying to tackle the touting problem.” – Martin Low, Transport Commissioner, Westminster (referring to satellite booking offices)

Touting is viewed by both industries (Taxi and Private Hire) as the single biggest enforcement and passenger safety issue affecting the trades. Enforcement numbers are ‘outstandingly low’, compared with other world cities.

Full GLA Report is Here

GMB Request for Suspension of Uber Licence to TFL

LogoFrom: Steve Garelick @ GMB Drivers [mailto:steve.garelick@gmbdrivers.org]
Sent: 17 April 2015 08:01
To: Blake Peter (PeterBlake@tfl.gov.uk); Hayward Siwan (Siwan.Hayward@Tfl.gov.uk); Chapman Helen (TPH) (HelenChapman@tfl.gov.uk)
Cc: simon.rush@gmbdrivers.org; michelle.bacon@gmb.org.uk;tony.warr@gmb.org.uk
Subject: Uber – Suspension of Licence

As you will be aware I tested Ubers system to confirm if a driver could drive uninsured or with false documents without immediate detection.

This has been proven and I again tested the system at the weekend to prove no substantive change has taken place.

Additionally one of TfLs Prerequisites is a book of complaints is supposed to be kept with appropriate resolutions.

I am doubtful that considering Uber have removed and restarted their twitter feeds that a full list of complaints is not in place.

Further to I understand that the UGC have kept a copy of the old Twitter feed of complaints which are at over 8000 this is a staggering amount even for a company of so many accomplished journey’s.

It would be hard to confirm this without actual data from twitter users which makes me question why the feeds with original complaints has been removed.

The fact that no inspection in person of validity of documents is a concern.

A further aspect of compliance is consistent complaints of rider accounts being used by other individuals.

This would point towards hacking or sales of client data.

Additionally the fraudulent transactions breach PCI DSS rules. Understandably data protection is a specific aspect of licence applications as well as financial probity.

On this basis I believe that Ubers licence is not fit for purpose.

I might add that when initial licencing had taken place I questioned John Mason nearly 2 ½ Years ago and he advised me in a meeting at TfL that he licenced the company personally and all was in order.

This clearly was not the case.

I understand that if Ubers licence is revoked they will switch tack to a ride share scenario not only are the DBS issues but this will question the ethicacy of this company further.

Notwithstanding my evidence and concerns I believe it is time to find a meaningful solution.

I am also concerned that not only are devices being exchanged between drivers (Something I foresaw and mentioned previously.) but there is clearly a avoidance of tax as I understand you may nominate overseas accounts. This may also be leading to benefit abuse.

Stealing benefits from those who really need them is not only unacceptable but immoral.

GMB would now formally request a suspension of Uber London’s licence until solutions if any can be found.

Steve Garelick
Branch Secretary Professional Drivers G56
07565 456776
www.gmbdrivers.org

Terror of driver as he desperately battles to control runaway new Routemaster bus

The aftermath of the scene of the bus crash Picture: Nigel Howar

This is the terrifying moment a new Routemaster bus crashes after accelerating out of control through London’s streets.

The dramatic CCTV footage shows driver Mohammed Khalique battling with the controls as the double decker careers through a junction at speeds of up to 40 mph before smashing into the back of a car.

Three people were seriously injured, including one passenger who broke his back and the bus driver who was cut free from the wreckage.

Twelve others suffered minor injuries in the collision which involved two other buses and three cars near Sloane Square in September 2013.

The CCTV evidence was obtained by the Standard today after Mr Khalique, 60 from Newham, was cleared by a court of driving without due care and attention, a charge which he denied.

A judge at Bexley magistrates court said he could not be sure whether the driver or a “computer glitch” had caused a malfunction in the high-tech vehicle.

The court saw CCTV footage from the new Routemaster, nicknamed the Boris Bus, as Mr Khalique frantically tried to control it for about 40 seconds.

District judge Dennis Lynch said the incident was “truly terrifying to those looking at it and must have been even more terrifying for those directly involved, particularly Mr Khalique.”

Terror: Driver Mohammed Khalique screams in fear as he struggles to steer the bus

The prosecution claimed Mr Khalique mistakenly pumped the accelerator instead of the brake and a Transport for London report discounted computer malfunction.

However, the defence argued the computer control systems controlling the brakes failed and Mr Khalique tried to control the vehicle.

Two expert witnesses told the court their analysis suggested the crash resulted from electrical failure in the £354,000 Wrightbus manufactured buses which started service in 2012.

The court heard that the lunchtime accident happened on the Aldwych-bound 11 route, operated by Go Ahead London.

The final scene of the terrifying bus CCTV shows the bus’s shattered windscreen

The bus speeded up after pulling out in Lower Sloane Street and missed a car at a crossroads before crashing into stationary traffic in Chelsea Bridge Road.

Mr Khalique told police he tried the engine isolator and brakes, which were “completely dead”.

In a statement to police he said: “As soon as I pull out bus is going like a bullet, it’s generating itself speed.”

He feared applying the handbrake would flip the bus, adding: “I thought I’m going to die that day.”

Witness Steve Greensword was on-board with his two children and broke his back when the bus crashed into the back of cars.  He told the court: “I ran back to try and protect my children.

“(Mr Khalique) kept saying: ‘I have no brakes, I can’t stop.’”

Cleared: Mohammed Khalique said he ‘thought he would die’ in the out of control bus Picture: Lucy Young

PC Adrian Armstrong, a Met forensic collision investigator who examined the bus, told the court evidence suggested Mr Khalique mistakenly pumped the accelerator instead of the brake.

This caused “maximum acceleration with no braking whatsoever,” PC Armstrong said.

The court heard Mr Khalique, a married father and bus driver for 13 years, was a cautious driver with a good record who was driving “very slowly and steadily” before the crash.

Sensors showed the brakes working normally beforehand.

Four other drivers told the court they had experienced technical problems on the new Routemasters, including on-board computer failure, loss of power, and the steering and brakes locking up

But engineering reports showed no logged complaints of brake failure on Boris buses, although there had been other computer problems, including 18 upgrades to the air conditioning system.

Finding Mr Khalique not guilty, district judge Lynch said: “I cannot be sure that it was Mr Khalique at fault, rather than an unascertained, potentially crucial, computer glitch.

“I cannot be sure beyond reasonable doubt that it was your driving at fault.”

Speaking afterwards, Mr Khalique, who has left the company, said: “I’m ok now, but this last year has been really stressful.”

Leon Daniels, TfL’s managing director of surface transport, said: “New Routemaster buses remain a safe and valued part of the capital’s transport infrastructure.”